Two weeks ago, working my way through a gift certificate to a used bookstore on University Way (Twice Sold Tales), I picked up all five of Lloyd Alexander's "Prydain Chronicles": The Book of Three, The Black Cauldron, The Castle of Llyr, Taran Wanderer, & The High King.
I read these in the third or fourth grade and remember adoring them, though I didn't get, at the time, any of the references to Welsh legends (many characters are covert homages or open imports from Welsh mythology) or many of the archetypes at work in general. This was the first fantasy epic I remember reading, even though "epic" might seem a strong word for a series with no installment over 300 pages, especially in the age of Harry Potter. Before rereading them this past week, my strongest memories of this series were the completely awesome bard with the polygraphic harp (it breaks every time he exaggerates, and he exaggerates, as one would expect of a storyteller, all the time) and the fact that one of the chapters in the first installment ends with the bonechilling line "Before Taran could reach for his sword, the animal sprang." Because I'm a loving older sister, I stopped the book THERE for the night when I was reading it to my six year old brother. I'm pretty sure I also hissed "The animal sprang!" at him periodically throughout the next two or three days before finally relenting and reading him the next bit in the story. Miraculously, we're still talking to each other as adults.
Going over them this time, I appreciated an element that I missed entirely the first time around. These are books filled with archetypes, not to say stereotypes: the callow farm boy with dreams of shining armor and gallant charges, the slightly airheaded rebellious princess whom he hates on sight and who's clearly destined for him, the strong, silent warrior, doubtless older than he looks, who lingers on the sidelines of his quests to mentor, reprimand and generally save his rear end when required. There's even a sort-of-animal sidekick in Gurgi, whose catchphrase "Crunching and munchings?", as delivered by my fifth grade teacher, could send us all into stitches.
The story is more predictable and the language simpler than a lot of what's exploded into Young Adult Lit over the past ten years, especially in the fantasy department. But I was still giggling at snarky exchanges and weeping at the finale, and it's because there's an economy of expression in these books that's been almost abolished from modern literature. I'm much more of a Les Miserables than a The Old Man and the Sea reader myself; I appreciate those big sprawling stories that you can lose yourself in for days, make into four-hour-long movies, and, in a pinch, use as a footstool to reach the top shelf. By thirty pages into The Book of Three, the first installment, we've already introduced our hero, established his main predicament, removed him from his comfortable, if boring, home and plunged him headlong into danger accompanied by a heroic mentor whose own mission lies parallel to the hero's and will be compromised if he turns aside to help. Just for comparison's sake, this takes Tolkien about a sixth of The Lord of the Rings.
(For the record, this is comparing apples and oranges. I have actually written papers arguing that the entire structure of Tolkien's epic falls apart if you don't pay attention to those interminable first chapters that introduce the Shire, establish the Hobbit friendships and take our four diminutive heroes through a sort of Basic Training. But Alexander certainly gets the job done faster.)
The thing is, while moving the plot at such a rapid pace, Alexander isn't sacrificing character development or world-building; he's just doing it in clear, broad strokes, letting the reader's imagination do a lot. He's not using ten words where two will do. And he's taking advantage of the fact that his audience, children and young teenagers, are storytellers at their core and will create the story's world with only minimal input from him. The language is spare and the emotions of the characters are put out bluntly, but the story unfolded in my mind as vividly as any other. Maybe even more so!
There's a number of shorter young adult series and trilogies that I read in my childhood which I'd like to see enjoy some of the benefits of the explosion of the genre: Ursula K. Leguin's Earthsea trilogy, for one, and John Christopher's The White Mountains and its sequels. Some of the tomes my students have read last year and this year didn't actually seem to have enough story to justify their great weight of words. And especially this month, with my students (and me!) frantically throwing pages at our wordcount goals, I'm thinking about the importance of a good story at the core.
Lloyd Alexander's shorter books not be much more than 50,000 words. But every word is a crucial part of the story he's telling. Just something to think about.
And now, back to my own word count -- far behind where I should be today! Time for Write Or Die!
Funny you should write about this, I just Netflixed Disney's rendition of 'The Black Cauldron,' which was basically an animated mash up of 'The Book of Three' and 'The Black Cauldron.' I also had a half hour recount to my girlfriend of my experiences reading through the novels.
ReplyDeleteNow, along the years, my Prydain chronicles have become buried in old moving boxes in Philadelphia. Seeking them out either in my dad's storage facility or his attic would be a quest unto itself, so I'm really desiring to pick them up again. However, I'm trying to get the entire compendium (as in, every book in one binding). This is proving difficult, though: for some reason, that printing is $50.00 or more at least.
I'm torn between shelling out the money for the compendium and just sucking it up and ordering each book individually. Decisions.
But yes, the series really is incredible. I am still surprised it does not have more fans. As it was with you, it was my first real fantasy series (started in 5th grade) and I have so many memories of it. I remember finishing 'The High King' and being so moved by the ending, yet so distraught that there was no more adventures for Taran.
OMG, have we talked about this series? Surely we have! It was immensely important to me as a child. Now I need to reread it. I have all but the last book...
ReplyDeleteI don't think I've read The White Mountains but if it's on par with Prydain and Earthsea, I'll clearly have to.
-Kaitey
Well, you know my feelings on the series, so I will be quiet. ;0) I did want to ask if I'd given you that essay in Mythlore about the Scourging of the Shire? Your mention of the structure and your papers reminded me of it; I thought of you the whole time I was reading it.
ReplyDeleteKaitey, the White Mountains is interesting as post-apocalyptic sci-fi. It has NO female characters worth paying attention to, which is why I'm recommending it to some of my weekend students who loved "The Hunger Games" and engaging in fun little nascent feminist dialogues with them. :4)
ReplyDeleteJenn, did you ever read the rest of them? I know you read The High King, and rereading it, you're right, the tragic-death-to-chapter ratio is pretty significant. But it's like judging all the LotR films based on Helm's Deep.
Jared, I found mine for like $3 apiece in used bookstore or on Amazon; it's totally worth it.
ReplyDeleteCheriest of cheries, yes, I reread the entire saga sometime last year and we had a whole long discussion on it. You obviously are sleep deprived and don't remember. Although I don't really remember complaining about the death-to-chapter ratio, though I may have. Actually, yes, I read High King first, picked it up as a plane book sometime in sixth grade, and I guess it left enough of a favorable impression that occasionally throughout the years I thought, "Oh yeah, that's part of that series I should read the beginning of." Though it took me until last year to do it, at which point I discovered I was not a huge fan, even of High King. But I'm not saying it's not a good series, just that I don't like it personally. And I think if I had read it all and liked it when I was younger I would probably appreciate it more now.
ReplyDelete